1992 Geo Metro vs 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1992 Geo Metro | 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 54 | 115 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 1 | 22 |
| Investigations | 1 | 2 |
| Crash reports | 6 | 3 |
| Fire reports | 0 | 1 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 33–40 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | 90,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Geo Metro | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 6 | 72 |
| Seat Belts | 9 | 28 |
| Suspension | 9 | 3 |
| Latches/locks/linkages | 7 | 0 |
| Structure | 7 | 0 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 5 | 2 |
| Visibility | 5 | 2 |
| Electrical System | 4 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 5 | 0 |
1992 Geo Metro
1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Geo Metro vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.