1992 Geo Storm vs 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1992 Geo Storm | 1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 77 | 115 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 1 | 22 |
| Investigations | 0 | 2 |
| Crash reports | 17 | 3 |
| Fire reports | 0 | 1 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 22–28 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | 90,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Geo Storm | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Power Train | 4 | 72 |
| Seat Belts | 3 | 28 |
| Electrical System | 22 | 2 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 16 | 2 |
| Air Bags | 15 | 1 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 11 | 2 |
| Suspension | 2 | 3 |
| Steering | 4 | 0 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 9 | 0 |
1992 Geo Storm
1992 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Geo Storm vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.