1994 Chevrolet Camaro vs 1994 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1994 Chevrolet Camaro | 1994 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 144 | 72 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 22 | 25 |
| Investigations | 2 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 21 | 4 |
| Fire reports | 19 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–20 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | 80,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Camaro | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Seat Belts | 2 | 36 |
| Power Train | 12 | 20 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 21 | 4 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 17 | 5 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 21 | 0 |
| Electrical System | 19 | 0 |
| Structure | 17 | 0 |
| Visibility | 14 | 1 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 6 | 0 |
1994 Chevrolet Camaro
1994 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Chevrolet Camaro vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.