1995 Chevrolet Camaro vs 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 1995 Chevrolet Camaro | 1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 216 | 56 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 51 | 38 |
| Investigations | 2 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 39 | 6 |
| Fire reports | 22 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18–20 | 18–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Chevrolet Camaro | Mitsubishi 3000GT |
|---|---|---|
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 60 | 5 |
| Power Train | 23 | 23 |
| Air Bags | 32 | 3 |
| Electrical System | 22 | 1 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 20 | 1 |
| Seat Belts | 9 | 12 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 17 | 1 |
| Visibility | 15 | 1 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Brake problems | 14 | 0 |
| Steering problems | 6 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 5 | 0 |
| Overheating | 5 | 0 |
1995 Chevrolet Camaro
1995 Mitsubishi 3000GT
Compare all Chevrolet Camaro vs Mitsubishi 3000GT years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.