2000 Honda CR-V vs 2000 Land Rover Range Rover
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Honda CR-V | 2000 Land Rover Range Rover |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 129 | 26 |
| Recall campaigns | 2 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 83 | 15 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 11 | 2 |
| Fire reports | 5 | 4 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 21 | 12–13 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 92,845 mi | — |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Honda CR-V | Land Rover Range Rover |
|---|---|---|
| Air Bags | 43 | 3 |
| Power Train | 15 | 8 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 15 | 5 |
| Electrical System | 15 | 1 |
| Tires | 14 | 1 |
| Structure | 10 | 1 |
| Seat Belts | 8 | 0 |
| Suspension | 4 | 3 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 9 | 0 |
| Check engine light | 6 | 0 |
2000 Honda CR-V
2000 Land Rover Range Rover
Compare all Honda CR-V vs Land Rover Range Rover years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.