2000 Honda CR-V vs 2000 Toyota 4RUNNER
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Honda CR-V | 2000 Toyota 4RUNNER |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 129 | 379 |
| Recall campaigns | 2 | 0 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 83 | 73 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 11 | 9 |
| Fire reports | 5 | 1 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 21 | 16–19 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 92,845 mi | 145,280 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Honda CR-V | Toyota 4RUNNER |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | 10 | 255 |
| Suspension | 4 | 97 |
| Power Train | 15 | 32 |
| Air Bags | 43 | 3 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 15 | 7 |
| Steering | 1 | 18 |
| Electrical System | 15 | 3 |
| Tires | 14 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Stalling | 9 | 7 |
| Check engine light | 6 | 0 |
| Rust / corrosion | 0 | 275 |
| Vibration / shaking | 0 | 11 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 6 |
2000 Honda CR-V
2000 Toyota 4RUNNER
Compare all Honda CR-V vs Toyota 4RUNNER years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.