2000 Mitsubishi Diamante vs 2002 Mitsubishi Diamante
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Mitsubishi Diamante | 2002 Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 51 | 123 |
| Recall campaigns | 3 | 3 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 62 | 59 |
| Investigations | 0 | 0 |
| Crash reports | 3 | 4 |
| Fire reports | 0 | 0 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 18 | 18 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 57,171 mi | 63,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Mitsubishi Diamante | Mitsubishi Diamante |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility | 27 | 71 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 7 | 38 |
| Power Train | 3 | 10 |
| Electrical System | 2 | 9 |
| Fuel System, Gasoline | 3 | 4 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 3 | 4 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 3 | 1 |
| Air Bags | 2 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Overheating | 0 | 11 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 8 |
| Stalling | 0 | 6 |
2000 Mitsubishi Diamante
2002 Mitsubishi Diamante
Compare all Mitsubishi Diamante vs Mitsubishi Diamante years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.