2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse vs 2000 Toyota Celica
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse | 2000 Toyota Celica |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 308 | 106 |
| Recall campaigns | 5 | 2 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 140 | 96 |
| Investigations | 3 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 14 | 13 |
| Fire reports | 6 | 2 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 20–23 | 23–27 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 70,000 mi | 69,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Mitsubishi Eclipse | Toyota Celica |
|---|---|---|
| Wheels | 128 | 1 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 11 | 41 |
| Structure | 41 | 6 |
| Power Train | 17 | 20 |
| Exterior Lighting | 25 | 6 |
| Electrical System | 21 | 6 |
| Visibility | 21 | 1 |
| Tires | 19 | 2 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 23 | 0 |
| Vibration / shaking | 19 | 0 |
| Stalling | 9 | 8 |
| Electrical failures | 8 | 0 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 6 |
| Oil consumption | 0 | 5 |
2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse
2000 Toyota Celica
Compare all Mitsubishi Eclipse vs Toyota Celica years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.