2000 Toyota 4RUNNER vs 2002 Toyota 4RUNNER
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2000 Toyota 4RUNNER | 2002 Toyota 4RUNNER |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 379 | 192 |
| Recall campaigns | 0 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 73 | 99 |
| Investigations | 0 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 9 | 12 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 2 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 16–19 | 16 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 145,280 mi | 136,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Toyota 4RUNNER | Toyota 4RUNNER |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | 255 | 88 |
| Suspension | 97 | 43 |
| Power Train | 32 | 29 |
| Steering | 18 | 10 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 7 | 7 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 5 | 8 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 4 | 7 |
| Service Brakes | 1 | 10 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 275 | 115 |
| Vibration / shaking | 11 | 10 |
| Stalling | 7 | 0 |
| Clunking / rattling | 6 | 0 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 7 |
2000 Toyota 4RUNNER
2002 Toyota 4RUNNER
Compare all Toyota 4RUNNER vs Toyota 4RUNNER years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.