2002 Ford Ranger vs 2003 Ford Ranger
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2002 Ford Ranger | 2003 Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 346 | 243 |
| Recall campaigns | 3 | 1 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 128 | 68 |
| Investigations | 0 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 43 | 37 |
| Fire reports | 12 | 11 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 15–23 | 15–23 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 56,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Ford Ranger | Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|
| Structure | 49 | 43 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 51 | 40 |
| Power Train | 61 | 16 |
| Air Bags | 37 | 25 |
| Suspension | 36 | 23 |
| Engine and Engine Cooling | 39 | 18 |
| Service Brakes, Hydraulic | 20 | 29 |
| Tires | 29 | 10 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 45 | 38 |
| Stalling | 18 | 18 |
| Vibration / shaking | 18 | 10 |
| Airbag warning light | 11 | 8 |
| Clunking / rattling | 10 | 0 |
| Hesitation / surging | 8 | 10 |
| Brake problems | 0 | 5 |
2002 Ford Ranger
2003 Ford Ranger
Compare all Ford Ranger vs Ford Ranger years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.