2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2016 Subaru Outback
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 8, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | 2016 Subaru Outback |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 47 | 640 |
| Recall campaigns | 1 | 4 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 480 | 467 |
| Investigations | 1 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 1 | 21 |
| Fire reports | 1 | 3 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | 5/5 |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 24 | 22–28 |
| Median reported incident mileage | — | 35,900 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | Subaru Outback |
|---|---|---|
| Electrical System | 10 | 308 |
| Visibility/wiper | 13 | 83 |
| Engine | 3 | 53 |
| Power Train | 3 | 45 |
| Steering | 3 | 24 |
| Structure | 5 | 19 |
| Vehicle Speed Control | 2 | 20 |
| Service Brakes | 2 | 18 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Battery drain | 0 | 84 |
| Won’t start | 0 | 33 |
| Stalling | 0 | 30 |
| Hesitation / surging | 0 | 15 |
| Rust / corrosion | 0 | 9 |
| Vibration / shaking | 0 | 5 |
| Clunking / rattling | 0 | 5 |
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
2016 Subaru Outback
Compare all Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Subaru Outback years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.