2016 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2016 Volvo XC90
Complaints, recalls, TSBs, investigations and safety ratings side by side, from official federal data. Last verified Aug 7, 2026. Raw complaint counts are not adjusted for sales volume.
| Metric | 2016 Land Rover Range Rover | 2016 Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| NHTSA complaints | 73 | 196 |
| Recall campaigns | 12 | 8 |
| Service bulletins (TSBs) | 773 | 721 |
| Investigations | 5 | 1 |
| Crash reports | 3 | 5 |
| Fire reports | 0 | 10 |
| NCAP overall rating | — | — |
| EPA MPG (combined) | 16–19 | 22–25 |
| Median reported incident mileage | 72,000 mi | 25,000 mi |
Reported problems side by side
| Component | Land Rover Range Rover | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 6 | 85 |
| Electrical System | 5 | 56 |
| Steering | 29 | 7 |
| Structure | 5 | 23 |
| Fuel/propulsion System | 9 | 12 |
| Suspension | 18 | 1 |
| Power Train | 5 | 10 |
| Service Brakes | 1 | 14 |
Symptoms owners describe
| Rust / corrosion | 9 | 0 |
| Stalling | 5 | 7 |
| Oil consumption | 0 | 30 |
| Loss of power | 0 | 9 |
| Check engine light | 0 | 8 |
| Overheating | 0 | 7 |
| Electrical failures | 0 | 6 |
2016 Land Rover Range Rover
2016 Volvo XC90
Compare all Land Rover Range Rover vs Volvo XC90 years →
Method. Complaints are unique NHTSA reports. A vehicle that sold more units will naturally accumulate more complaints — use shares and read the underlying reports before drawing conclusions.